Counsel, Advocacy & Representation for California Tenants

Do the new “Just Cause” requirements change other laws already in place?

Civil Code §1946.2 may not Displace Other Local Laws that Protect Tenants from Unjust Eviction

Several cities across California already have ordinances that require just cause to evict residential tenants. Whether these municipal ordinances will be replaced by the new statewide eviction controls enacted by the Tenant Protection Act will depend on the individual features of those ordinances.

The California legislature has explicitly stated that it does not intend to replace local laws that already require just cause for termination of residential tenancies, if those laws were adopted on or before September 1, 2019, so long as those already existing ordinances are more protective than the new just cause requirements.  “More protective” is defined to mean:

  • The just cause requirements for termination under the local ordinance are consistent with Civil Code Section 1946.2

  • The ordinance further limits the reasons for termination of a residential tenancy, provides for higher relocation assistance amounts, or provides additional tenant protections that are not prohibited by any other provision of law.

  • The local government has made a binding finding within their local ordinance that the ordinance is more protective than the provisions of this section.

Residential Rentals will not be Subject to Both a Local Ordinance Requiring Just Cause to Evict and Civil Code § 1946.2. 

Civil Code §1946.2(g)(2) states: A residential real property shall not be subject to both a local ordinance requiring just cause for termination of a residential tenancy and this section.”  However, the placement of this subparagraph within the text of the statute suggests that any local laws that are less protective than Section 1946.2 may be supplanted, if they were enacted after September 2019.

Subparagraph (g)(2) immediately follows the clauses that require local laws to be either consistent with the Protecting Tenants Act, or have even more protections, or that any local government enacting just cause protections pass a resolution affirming that their ordinance is more protective than the just cause requirements now enacted Statewide.

Subparagraph §1946.2(g)(1)(A), however, simply states that the regulations do not apply to “Residential real property subject to a local ordinance requiring just cause for termination of a residential tenancy adopted on or before September 1, 2019, in which case the local ordinance shall apply. ”

§1946.2(g)(1)(A), creates a strange discrepancy wherein certain long term tenants (like those living in San Diego, who are protected by the Tenants Right to Know Regulations) may not be entitled to relocation benefits even though they are being terminated through no fault of their own.

San Diego’s Tenants’ Right to Know Regulations

San Diego already has a municipal ordinance that contains a just cause requirement.  The “Tenants’ Right to Know” protections (see San Diego Municipal Code § §98.0730 et al.) are very similar to the requirements of the new Civil Code Section 1946.2, and in some cases they are more restrictive.  For example, the exclusions in the Civil Code Section which make it inapplicable to properties built in the past 15 years, single-family residences owned by individuals, and duplexes do not apply. 

So, if you live in San Diego, and the rental unit you lived in was built after 2005, or a duplex shared with your landlord in the other unit, the State statute would not protect you, but if you have lived there for more than two years, you would still be protected by the local Tenants’ Right to Know regulations.

However, The San Diego Tenants’ Right to Know regulations are not as restrictive as the Civil Code just cause requirements in other ways.

They do not not protect tenants who have lived in units for less than 2 years, whereas the Civil Code §1946.2 requirements apply to tenants who have continually occupied a rental property for 12 months.  The San Diego Municipal regulations also do not require the payment of any relocation fees. 

As of the end of 2019, the City Council of San Diego has not taken up any effort to change the Tenants’ Right to Know Regulations to require the payment of relocation assistance for “No Fault” terminations. 

What this means is that whether any particular San Diego tenant, whose tenancy is not protected by the Tenants’ Right to Know regulations, may still assert his or her rights under Civil Code §1946.2, and potentially demand relocation benefits, will have to be decided in court.

Given the differences between the Tenants’ Right to Know regulations and State law just cause requirements, San Diego tenants should not assume anything.

Tenants should Educate Themselves with Help from Legal Counsel Before Jumping to Conclusions

If you have legal questions about how the just cause requirements of Civil Code § 1946.2 will protect you, whether you are a tenant in San Diego, or elsewhere in California, speak with a tenant’s rights attorney. It’s good news that California now mandates landlords have just cause before terminating most residential tenancies. However, the fight is not over. Rest assured that landlord attorneys and property managers will be working hard to find ways to get around the law. But don’t get discouraged.

Landlords are not the only ones who have attorneys.

Tenants cannot assume that the just cause eviction controls will bring about a new era of well-behaved landlords. The law is only meaningful when tenants understand it, effectively assert their rights under it, and if needed, have the backing of an attorney who will stand by them to back it up. You may be surprised to learn all the different ways we can fight to protect your home. Don’t think you have to go it alone, or rely upon the opinions of friends and neighbors, or what you read online. Get professional legal help from a tenant defender.


More Posts


Tenant Rights During Covid On June 29, the California Legislature enacted new changes to several different laws that significantly impact California renters’ rights. It is

Tenants Rights Attorney

San Diego Attorney Specializing in Eviction Defense & Tenants Rights Marc D. Whitham Marc D. Whitham is a San Diego tenant rights lawyer who has devoted

Just Cause Eviction

Summary of Just Cause Requirements California Civil Code Section 1946.2 requires that landlords have “just cause” to terminate or evict certain long-term tenants. This statute

Get Representation

If you have a situation that is more than a question, and are already having a dispute with your landlord, then information alone is often not enough to settle the matter to your advantage. What most renters need, but seldom have, is an attorney who knows the law, and the landlord’s duties under the law, and is not afraid to advocate for tenants.

Even the most informed tenants can find the court system overwhelming.  Defending against eviction on your own is more than just challenging.  Fort the unprepared and unrepresented it is an ordeal filled with traps.  Tenants who go to court without an attorney frequently enter into bad agreements and suffer humiliation at the hands of the landlord’s lawyers. Having an experienced attorney on your side will make a difference.

Get Informed

If your situation is not a lawsuit in court, but rather a question, or a curiosity about what the law says, there are many places where you can find educational materials, and  every tenant should become familiar with the legal protections for tenants in California law.

Many times the answer to tenants’ legal questions are more complicated than they may first appear.  It’s important to be careful, and not to rely upon every piece of information posted online, or simply accept the advice of friends and neighbors.  Make sure the source of your legal advice is reliable and up to date.

Look around the website and see if we have information to help you.  If you have a question and you can’t find an answer,  click here to send us a comment.  An attorney that specializes in advocating for tenants will reply, and can direct you to the resources you need. 

Don't go to Trial unprepared

Written notices demanding the payment of rent, notices that threaten the termination of your lease, accusations of illegal activity, and notices of changes in terms and conditions of a lease from a landlord or property manager are often the prelude to legal action.  They must be taken seriously.  It is critical for tenants to respond to notice from a landlord intelligently and prudently.

Before you agree to excessive rent increases, or allow the oppressive actions of the owner or management intimidate you, meet with a professional.

Information, early in time, is the key to success.  Often times becoming informed can help you to avoid being on defense.  If you are not able to avoid litigation, then consult with an attorney who stands with tenants and defends their rights.

Don't Waste Time

When a tenant has a legal conflict with the landlord, there is often only a short period of time to act.  Under California law, landlords are usually required to give notice to tenants before they resort to legal action. However, most of these legally required notices give a tenant only three days to act.  When a tenant fails to act within the three days then the landlord can proceed to court.

Once an action to evict (also called unlawful detainer) is filed against a tenant in court, it can move very quickly.   Landlords enjoy a unique legal procedure, which is known as a summary proceeding.   Once a tenant is sued in court, and then served with an unlawful detainer summons, then he or she has only five days to respond.

If your landlord has sued you or is threatening to sue you, then you must act quickly. Hesitation and uncertainty can lead to a loss of money, loss of security and the loss of your home. Don’t wait.  Schedule an appointment for a consultation  immediately to discuss your case.